Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

Entries Tagged as 'Woodstock.com'

Today In Woodstock History: Day Two of Woodstock 1994

Featured , Misc , Woodstock.com 2 Comments »

Woodstock 1994

After a bonus day of music on Friday and an all-night rave, the crowd at Woodstock 94 was ready for high noon on Saturday. 25 years after taking the stage at Woodstock as a relatively unknown artist in the Unites States, Joe Cocker was given the duties of bridging the gap and bringing the spirit to the anniversary of the greatest festival of all time. Woodstock 94 definitely paid tribute to the now classic rock icons on Saturday with CSN and The Band, but this was not your father’s Woodstock. Cypress Hill and Salt N Pepa brought the hip hop flavor, The Cranberries and Melissa Etheridge rocked, Aerosmith, Henry Rollins and Metallica REALLY rocked and Nine Inch Nails got very dirty, joining the growing number of Mud People. Rain, mud, music and no regrets…Saturday channeled the Woodstock vibe like no one thought possible. You might have drank a Pepsi or two at Woodstock 94, but that did not take away from an unforgettable 14 hours of peace & music! Share your soggy stories from the farm right here at Woodstock.com.

The Jimi Hendrix Messenger

Featured , Misc , Woodstock.com , Woodstock Music 1 Comment »

It is only March, yet it has already been a great year to be a Jimi Hendrix fan.  We've already seen a BRAND NEW album of never released completed material, Valleys Of Neptune, and two amazing music videos.  We also have the deluxe editions of Jimi's classic albums and the Blu-Ray of Jimi's legendary Woodstock performance.  

Well, you ask, what now?

I guess it is time to tell you about the Jimi Hendrix Messenger.  What is the Jimi Hendrix Messenger?  Is it a hippie on a bike delivering parcel?  No, no, no.  The messenger is a cool video that you can put your own text into.  The performance is Jimi Hendrix at the Isle Of Wight in 1970 playing Foxy Lady.  There is someone in the front row holding up a sign.  Who is it?  It's you. That's right, YOU!

Visit www,jimimessaging.com and you can put whatever you want into the banners.  Tell Jimi you love pizza or that you think John Mayer is overrated - write whatever you want!  Or write banners about your friends and send them the video.  Tell Maria that you know she is cheating on your brother or let Carlos know that his opinions on health care are wack - again, write whatever you want!

So check it out and start creating some content, baby!  And don't eat the brown acid.

www,jimimessaging.com

 

NEW Jimi Hendrix video for Bleeding Heart

Featured , Music News , Woodstock.com , Woodstock Music 2 Comments »

Have you ever wondered what it would be like if Jimi Hendrix was around to play the current festival scene.  Well, wonder no more.  

The second video from Jimi's NEW album Valleys Of Neptune is for the song Bleeding Heart.  Director Julien Temple, who made fantastic documentaries of the Sex Pistols (The Filth & The Fury) & Joe Strummer, has crafted the new Hendrix video to show you exactly what it would look like, and feel like, if Jimi headlined a modern festival.

In case you actually don't remember our previous posts, Valleys Of Neptune is the new album of previously unreleased songs that were completed by Jimi Hendrix shortly before he kissed the sky. You can buy the album anywhere and everywhere, and you should.  

Look for the Kate Moss cameo - I know I did.

 

Woodstock Legend Artie Kornfeld speaks to Woodstock.com

Featured , Books , Woodstock.com , Interview , Woodstock Music 9 Comments »

Artie Kornfeld (photo by Bettie Marshall)Four decades ago, four twenty-somethings got together and created the defining moment of a generation - Woodstock.  The spirit of peace, love and music from the 1969 festival lives on in so many ways.  Heck, look at what website you are on right now.  

Artie Kornfeld was one of those four young men who put a permanent stamp on our culture.  Prior to being "The Father of Woodstock" at age 27, Artie had already had a long career as a songwriter, performer and executive in the music industry.

Recently, Artie Kornfeld's book The Pied Piper Of Woodstock was published.  This book looks at Artie's childhood, career and family life.  We here at Woodstock.com, recently had the opportunity to speak to Artie.  After we got finished thanking him over and over again for Woodstock, we talked about his life and his music.  The Pied Piper Of Woodstock is a great read and naturally we suggest you pick up a copy, and then buy one for all your friends.  The book is available at  http://www.amazon.com/Pied-Piper-Woodstock-Artie-Kornfeld/dp/0615325998/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1255287856&sr=8-3-spell

Also, you can, and should, check out Artie Kornfeld's Spirit of the Woodstock Nation radio program at http://www.artistfirst.com/woodstocknation.htm.

Woodstock.com:  You left your job at Capitol Records to focus on Woodstock.  What was your vision and expectations for Woodstock after the festival?  Where did you want to take that Woodstock Ventures

Artie Kornfeld:  I knew there was going to be a movie and a record and I was too busy doing what I had to do to get the people there peacefully.  Others were building the stage and the field and that stuff, I was creating a consciousness.  As far as that goes, when I left Capitol, within two years at 25 or 26, I would probably have been the President (of the label), because I had a great record of signing great acts, putting my money behind the band and putting my money behind the games people played.  I probably would have been the (label) President, but it wasn't that critical to me.  

I didn't intend to take Woodstock Ventures anywhere.  (My vision) was just to keep the music going and it just so happened that Michael Lang and I were good friends.  As close as two men could be, with (my wife) Linda in there too as part of it.  She has as much credit as Michael and I for the idea coming out.  She was very cosmic and she picked up on the vibe.  It was kids building a tree house.  I was a songwriter who knew how to get words to people.  That's what it was about.  There was mutual trust.  There was a great friendship.  I never thought about going any further until after Woodstock.

I was able to raise money to start a record company, because I had already negotiated a deal before I left Woodstock Ventures for a million dollars from Atlantic Records and Jerry Wexler, butArtie Kornfeld at Woodstockthat fell through.  So, for me, it was just to keep the music going.

Woodstock.com:  As a songwriter, what is your opinion of Joni Mitchell's song "Woodstock?"  Do you think it was a valid interpretation?  How did you feel about it at the time?  

Artie Kornfeld:   I really thought it was quite amazing that probably from talking to the guys - David, Graham, Steven and maybe even Neil - that she was able to come up pretty much with a great interpretation, (like) someone who was there.  It was incredible and I guess the spirit reached her.  I guess she embraced everything that happened and probably wished she could have been there singing at Woodstock.  I remember when Michael came in and said I just got a note from David (about the song), because we were friends with David from the Grove.  In fact I remember my late child Jamie sitting on Crosby's lap and calling him "Strawberry Crosby" and him laughing.  When I first heard it by Crosby Stills & Nash I thought it was fantastic.  I really did.

Woodstock.com:  In your recent autobiography, The Pied Piper of Woodstock, it sheds light on your career and your life.  People assume that Woodstock was your defining moment, but was it?

Artie Kornfeld:   I think when I first looked through the glass and saw my late daughter Jamie laying there in her crib that that was the defining moment in my life.  Families are important to me, that is why I talk a lot about family in my book and the accomplishments of my father, as a union organizer, and my mother, being a founder of the Freedom Rides and her commendation from the Congress Of Racial Equality.  We had threats on our lives and all that stuff.  My dad was a New York City cop who had to have three jobs his whole life to support us.  The highlight (of my childhood) was Levittown.  Those houses went for four grand.  To me that was like Sutton Place compared to the huts we lived in after World War II.  I didn't see my dad until I was three because he got injured in the Pacific.  That's it; I'm a war baby that loves music.

Woodstock.com:  What would you consider your defining professional moment?

Artie Kornfeld:   My defining professional moment is right now with the Spirit Of The Woodstock Nation (radio program), because I spent forty years keeping it alive and the fact that through the radio show the spirit of Woodstock is growing and young kids are joining.  I never expected my radio show to be the number one listened to show on the internet in the world.  Like having P.F. Sloan, writer of Eve Of Destruction, on the show.   That song has as much to do with Woodstock happening as the whole promotion and the whole Woodstock campaign.  Because that was the first song that said, except for the Pete Seeger songs that intimated, that this is about our generation. "Old enough to kill but not for voting. You tell me over and over again that we are not on the eve of destruction."  And right now, let's face it; we are on the eve of destruction.  But that doesn't mean we can't make a difference.  When I saw that walk for peace and people said, "Artie, you inspired this with all of your work on the internet and on your show."  It's not just me; it's a consciousness that is coming back to light.  

Woodstock.com:  What message would you like to give to the younger generation that has just discovered Woodstock for the first time?

Artie Kornfeld:  What Woodstock represented was not a concert.  It was not the movie.  It was the spirit of a generation pulling together to stop a war and to live a music culture of peace and harmony with the world.  That's what I say to the younger people.  Keep making music!  Instead of (just putting stuff) on Facebook and Myspace, try picking out a friend and just say "here is a demo I cut, take a listen."  Let's start getting music back into our culture.  That leads to free thinking and expression, which is why I wrote The Pied Piper in 1963.  It was about a guy who made music to get rid of the rats so the kids could express themselves and make music and dance in the streets, because they weren't allowed to.  Free yourself.  Woodstock happened a long time ago, but join the spirit of what Woodstock stood for. I call it the Spirit Of The Woodstock Nation.  You're coming aboard, and welcome.  We need you!

Woodstock.com:  Each of the four original members of Woodstock Ventures has a different legacy, a different piece they contributed.  How does Artie Kornfeld want his contributions to building the spirit of Woodstock to be remembered?

Artie Kornfeld:   John and Joel made an investment.  Joel and John put up two hundred and fifty grand.  It was two wealthy kids with an investment.  With Michael it was an introduction into the inside of the music industry.  That was through me, because he met a lot of my friends at the house and Michael started getting accepted.  I did feel that Michael and I were going to be together after.  I really wanted to build Michael's name up.  Not that he could match my resume, because my resume was already fifteen years of success doing music before that.  Michael had this connection to the underground and that side.  For me it was a fanatical thing.  I already had bread from my writing and I had just sold The Cowsills for quite a bit of money before Capitol. Yeah, money came into my head, but I was starting to see more and more what it could be and it became fanatical to me.  

Artie Kornfeld & Michael Lang 2009 (photo by Jed Taylor)I really went out of my way, advertising in Billboard, Cash Box and Record World and getting the articles in there. With the ad I ran on my wedding anniversary, I put that coupon on it.  We got the ticket guy from the Fillmore, and I ran that ad.  I knew I only had x amount of dollars to promote this thing and get the people into what it was going to be.  I only put the coupon to buy the ticket on the ad to see the addresses of who was going to buy, and that ad showed me two things.  One: stop advertising in the underground papers. People who read the underground papers are not going to pay for a concert. At that point there was going to be a fence, it was going to be a concert for profit.  Two:  I knew that I had to make that movie deal.  I didn't know that Joel and John had been trying to make a deal through the agencies.  I read in the paper that Freddy Weintraub became Vice President at Warner Brothers.  I knew him from The Bitter End.  When I was involved with the Lovin' Spoonful they played there, and I saw Dylan there for the first time.  Five years before, he came to me at Mercury with an act that really would never sell that I spent one hundred grand on.  He owed me one.  

Thank god he was there because three days before Woodstock, and on the way up, I read he was there. I called and said I was coming over and the movie deal was made.  Michael and I had did a lot of work before that because we had met with film people and we did decide that if Michael Wadleigh got his cameras up there he should be the guy.  We talked with Pennebaker and we passed on Barbara Koppel.  We decided if there was going to be a movie it should be Wadleigh.  It was just getting Wadleigh that hundred grand, which I believe was the first check he got before it was renegotiated and the lawyers.  It was just a handwritten contract which is exactly the way it should have been for something like Woodstock.  And it held.  

That ad I ran brought in a million five hundred thousand dollars.  So in reality, the ad that I ran on my anniversary financed Woodstock.  Eighteen dollars for three days of peace and music, that was cheap.  I think people were already feeling this was going to be going to Mecca.  Like, "we got to be there and be a part of this."  

The audience is really what made it happen, the people that came.  Let's face it; I really feel that I was a messenger.  Every song I wrote, I was a messenger.  I don't know where it came from. Thank whatever my higher power is that I am able to (write).  You write songs because you really want to get inside people.  

Building acts to me was the same as building the festival.  It was the same formula.  As I often said, taking Tracy Chapman, who was a black folk singer, to number one (was a highlight).  She was first black girl to be played on FM rock radio doing a folk song. Taking it to number one was as hard a promotion, if not harder than promoting Woodstock.  The same with Survivor, an unknown band with the number one selling song in history with Eye Of The Tiger.  An unknown band was killer too.

Woodstock.com:  What music inspires you today?

Artie Kornfeld:  That's a tough question because I don't listen to the music the way people listen to it.  We talked about it on the air when I was talking with Marty Balin (of the Jefferson Airplane), that the defining moments are in the studio when something clicks.  That rush it gives you and the message you're getting out.  I just flashed to how good it feels to be making music your whole life and actually make a living and surviving.  Not that I wasn't broke and didn't know where the rent was coming from at some points in the last forty years, because I had that too. Artie Kornfeld in 1965 with The Changing Times

When I heard Drops of Jupiter by Train, being a guy that produces records and writes songs I said, "this is great."  Reminds me of Neil Young After The Gold Rush, only from a younger prospective. So that stuck out.  When I heard the Green Day protest album (American Idiot), I said, "now that's special." 

I listen as a writer and a producer, having run three companies.  I listen for quality and if it is really saying something.  I even love Boogie Down Productions and KRS-One because they really were the first rap production company that made statements.  Jimmy Wear A Hat; telling kids to wear a condom in the ghetto because aids was around.  That was a very important message and that's why I love Boogie Down Productions.  Sometimes I go to their shows.  I would be in a very gang related crowd of three thousand people.  But with that pass from KRS-One you were treated like one of the gang.  That I liked.  Some of the new hip hop I am just finally getting into, when it is slow enough that my old ears can hear it and pick up on the lyrics.  If I could slow everything down I might really love hip hop.  The language is different.  We talked "groovy" and "right on" and a lot of hip hop is very angry.  They are making a statement too, because in reality they are still being prejudiced against in this country.  I believe in equality for all.  It's in the constitution.  Don't we live by that?  I don't believe we totally do right now, but I believe in the bill of rights.

Woodstock.com:  Would you rather there never be another interpretation of the Woodstock festival?  Do you think it is better left alone, as far as trying to replicate or celebrate the original festival, or whatever the last two were trying to achieve?

Artie Kornfeld:  To have another miracle?  Yeah, there might be another miracle that may be just as important as Woodstock, because we sure need one.  I sure hope one happens, but let's not have a miracle based on a generation that is four generations older than the mainstream of American youth right now.  Let's have it so everybody that can make a difference is involved.

I am not going to announce concerts that are not going to happen, but I am right now negotiating with three groups of people for major concerts.  They don't have Woodstock in the title, although it is connected because I am doing them.  My name is going to be there.

Woodstock is not just a Barbie doll to be sold.  It's a very spiritual special thing to all of us, and I am just one of the bunch.

 

Remember, you can check out Artie Kornfeld's Spirit of the Woodstock Nation radio program at http://www.artistfirst.com/woodstocknation.htm.

Also, you can purchase Artie's book, The Pied Piper of Woodstock at http://www.amazon.com/Pied-Piper-Woodstock-Artie-Kornfeld/dp/0615325998/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1255287856&sr=8-3-spell.

 


John Lennon biographer Philip Norman talks with Woodstock.com

Featured , Woodstock.com , Interview 1 Comment »

 

John Lennon By Philip NormanToday is the anniversary of one of the saddest days in music history. It was on this date in 1980 that John Lennon was murdered outside in New York City home in the Dakota building. He had just returned to the music scene, with the release of Double Fantasy, after several years as a house husband. Woodstock.com recently spoke to Philip Norman, author of John Lennon: The Life.

John Lennon takes a fresh and penetrating look at every aspect of Lennon's much-chronicled life, including the songs that have turned him, posthumously, into a near-secular saint. In three years of research, Norman has turned up an extraordinary amount of new information about even the best-known episodes of Lennon folklore—his upbringing by his strict Aunt Mimi; his allegedly wasted school and student days; the evolution of his peerless creative partnership with Paul McCartney; his Beatle-busting love affair with a Japanese performance artist; his forays into painting and literature; his experiments with Transcendental Meditation, primal scream therapy, and drugs. The book's numerous key informants and interviewees include Sir Paul McCartney, Sir George Martin, Sean Lennon—whose moving reminiscence reveals his father as never before—and Yoko Ono, who speaks with sometimes shocking candor about the inner workings of her marriage to John.

Honest and unflinching, as John himself would wish, Norman gives us the whole man in all his endless contradictions—tough and cynical, hilariously funny but also naive, vulnerable and insecure—and reveals how the mother who gave him away as a toddler haunted his mind and his music for the rest of his days.

 Click here for more information and to browse inside the book.

 

Woodstock.com: You had already written Shout! The Beatles In Their Generation; a book considered by many to be the definitive biography of The Beatles. What was it about John Lennon that made you want to tackle him as a subject separate from the group?

 

Philip Norman: Shout! was a portrait of a group, and kind of a sketch of John in the context of The Beatles. There seemed to be much much more to say about John because he was so much more than just a musician. When The Beatles stopped being The Beatles, John carried on to an extraordinary creative career for another ten or so years. It seemed there should be a full length portrait in oils, as well as my charcoal sketch.

Woodstock.com: When you began working on this book you had full cooperation from Yoko Ono Lennon. She later disapproved. What were her issues with the book's publication?

Philip Norman: I really don't know. The only caveat on her cooperation was that she would read the manuscript for factual accuracy, and it was written very much in the way that she'd always talked to me about John over the years. I first talked with her about John only five months after his death. She invited me to the Dakota building and we had a two hour talk on that occasion. She talked about John always in this slightly exacerbated tone and at the same time very lovingly, because they seem very much alike in character to me. Yoko just understood John, as he obviously understood her. So I really could not understand why this suddenly should seem to her as being, as she put it, "mean to John." What I wanted to write was a book about a human being. A human being with many many contradictions and obviously many flaws, but still someone who ultimately brought tremendous laughter, as well as wonderful music to the world.

Woodstock.com: In your book you dispel many of the myths about John's father Alf Lennon, or as he was later known, Freddie. He had always been painted as a man who abandoned his family and only reappeared when John became famous. Was this something you had planned to expose or was this information that you just ran into while researching the book?

Philip Norman: It happened because Freddie went on to marry a much younger woman and have two children with her. John's stepmother, who is much much younger than him actually, decided to talk to me and tell me about it. His father, again, was not a sort of shining paragon of virtue, but he was not a bad man. According to his own writes he tried to keep the family together. It became very clear that John was always very much enthralled to Aunt Mimi and he didn't want anything to take away from Aunt Mimi's achievement in bringing him up and educating him and protecting him as a surrogate parent. So John didn't want to know anything about his father's better side. He really didn't want anything to detract from Mimi's achievement in parenting him.

Woodstock.com: Was John ever able to get past his mother's death, and would you say that her passing was the defining moment in his life?

Philip Norman: Absolutely. Probably none of us really gets over our childhood, one way or another, but with John it was just so much with him. His mother was not like a mother to him, although she was in his life. Another of these myths is that she suddenly walked back into his life when he was in his teens. She didn't do that. She was in his life all through his childhood. She was living quite close to Aunt Mimi, but she wasn't like a mum. She was more like a flirtatious older sister or cousin. She was tremendous fun to be with. She really understood John. Made him laugh, gave him a terrifically good time, but still, because she was living with another man and had two children with another man, she really wasn't John's mom. She didn't really belong to him. She was slightly out of reach. Then for her to be killed in that tragic way by a car right outside Mimi's house at a very crucial point in John's teens. It was something he never did recover from. Right until the last month of his life, he was obsessing about his mother in almost sort of a sexual way, because she was very attractive. She didn't seem like his mother. This is also something that is a recognized syndrome if a boy is not with his mother in close child-parent terms and is then bereaved of his mother. There is that sexual sort of feeling in what remains behind.

Woodstock.com: John had many deaths in his life. His mother, Stu Sutcliffe, Brian Epstein, Mal Evans. How did they affect him?

Philip Norman: John had this curious slant on life. He regarded them all, these deaths, as personal slights against him. He used to say that people "died on" him, as if they were, in a way, failing in their duty as close people to him. We all do suffer bereavement as part of the education of life. In the case of John, it was first his Uncle George, then his mother. Those were two people he really loved and who were good to him in his childhood. And he had this terrible insecurity. Despite what you would think would be the ultimate amount of praise, accolade, to be hailed as a genius in his very early twenties. Still, he never felt secure. He never felt comfortable with himself. Never felt satisfied with what he was achieving or with himself. This awful insecurity is what comes through, really, the character. At the same time, in a way, he didn't doubt his own abilities and was sustained by tremendous self conviction, but on the other hand was always insecure and always very vulnerable.

Woodstock.com: In your book you mention that John's reactions to many of these deaths was often nervous laughter.

Philip Norman: I don't think it is an uncommon reaction. Strangely enough, in the East, people's reaction to tragedy and trauma is to, sort of, giggle and laugh. I don't think it is unknown for it to happen. He was someone who didn't ever really want to show he was vulnerable although he was so very vulnerable. They were terrible shocks and some shocks are unbelievable.

Woodstock.com: When do you think John was happiest?

Philip Norman: I think he could be happy pretty much all the time. He was very happy looking after Sean, his second son. I think it very much went in spasms with John. He could be very very happy and get a lot of fun out of life, and the next moment be plunged into awful depression. He had regular spells, he called them troffs, when he became very very down, but then he got a lot out of life as well. He did enjoy life. He enjoyed things like words, language and reading. He had intellectual resources, which is a great help. A great help in achieving happiness among other things.

Woodstock.com: So much has been made about the relationship between John and Paul McCartney. Your book details his relationships with the other Beatles. You write of John's perpetual fondness of Ringo. I found the relationship between John and George Harrison very interesting. George goes from being the kid in the group, a few years younger than John, to growing very close with John in the mid-1960's. They had their first acid trip together. They stayed the longest in Rishikesh with the Maharishi. At some point there was a strain in the relationship, including an actual fight off camera during the filming of Get Back, later to be Let It Be. There also seemed to be some hostility in the 1970's. What do you think John's relationship with George was, and do you think he respected George?

Philip Norman: I think he did. I think it has to be said that George was not on the same level of talent as John and Paul. I think by being around great songwriters it rubbed off on George and he did write some good songs at the end. I think John gave an enormous amount of recognition to George's work. He was even on record as saying Within You Without You was one of the outstanding tracks on Sgt. Pepper. It is actually one of the most boring tracks recorded on any album, so John went out of his way, really, to try and give George the recognition. But George ended up very bitter, there is no doubt about that. He felt he'd been overshadowed by the Lennon/McCartney partnership. He felt particular sort of bitterness against Paul McCartney and not so much against John. Though I think that George had a very ungracious grumpy side and I think that when Yoko appeared that George was pretty horrid at some point, so that all played it's part. Then he brought out a book and John didn't think George mentioned him enough in George's book, although i think there were more mentions in there of John than George's wife Olivia.

Woodstock.com: John was asked in the 1960's how he might die and he responded "I'll probably be popped off by some looney." When he returned from his musical hiatus he returned with songs about new beginnings. One of his posthumous releases was the song Borrowed Time. Do you think John had premonitions about his own death?

Philip Norman: Well, he was somebody that always used to rather like ouija boards and seances and things like that. His grandmother, who he never knew actually, her name was Polly. He only saw his Lennon grandmother twice before her death. She was known to be a bit of a psychic in the 1920's and 30's. And John kind of liked the occult. I did meet someone who knew him in the early 60's and said that he once said to her that he had a premonition that he would die young and would be shot.

Woodstock.com: What do you think drew John so strongly to Yoko? Do you think their usage of heroin together played a part?

Philip Norman: Not at all. It was something that they went through because John felt he had to try everything. Yoko had taken heroin before John actually. No, the whole thing was with John it was art. John wanted to be an artist. He wanted to be what he thought of as a real artist, and Yoko to him was a real artist. It was all about that. He really thought that she was amazing in that she did not give a damn what people said about her. He spent years having to be so afraid of his public image. To meet this woman, who did not give a damn, she did whatever she wanted to do, was really intoxicating to John. There was a strong sexual attraction. Yoko does have that. She still does. Probably more now, to more people, then she had 35 years ago. It was essentially aesthetic. It was art.

Woodstock.com: Your book details John's relationship with his first son, Julian. John was a distant father at best in the 1960's. It seemed that John and Julian reconnected during John's "Lost Weekend," but then they never saw each other again. Do you think that John regretted how his handled being a father to Julian?

Philip Norman: I'm sure he did, and of course as soon as he had his second son, Sean, that could only have brought back his failings with Julian. And they were terrible failings. He hadn't really wanted to get married at the point where he married his first wife Cynthia around the age of breaking through with The Beatles. She was pregnant and that is what young men did in those days. They married the young woman they made pregnant. He really took so little interest in Julian in his early years and then when Yoko came along it increased the distance. I am absolutely sure he was eaten up with remorse about that and made great efforts to create some sort of a relationship. That really was going on. He tried to keep it up, but still, it is a terrible mark against John. I can't hide the fact. I couldn't avoid that. He had been a terrible father to first son, all the more inexcusable because he felt his father walked out on him.

Woodstock.com: How much did John's immigration fight take out of him and his music?

Philip Norman: It didn't seem to take anything out of him really. He did at that point say he was retiring, that he was going to bring up Sean as a house husband. But he really didn't cut off from music. He said he did, but he was always tinkering with his guitar and writing down ideas. And he always felt competitive, still, with his main competitors, during those years. It was not a very nice experience, but on the other hand he always knew, in a way, that the media were always behind him. Particularly television. I don't think he ever really felt quite as, sort of, vulnerable to the U.S. government at the time as he might have done. He would go straight onto Dick Cavett and say the latest thing. That he'd been followed, his phone had been bugged. He'd be on network television talking about it.

Woodstock.com: What were you surprised to learn about John?

Philip Norman: I think it was this extraordinary insecurity, really. How he was not happy with himself even when you would have thought that his achievements were the ultimate. He was not happy with what he did artistically. He didn't feel secure inside. A lot of his violent spells are explained by insecurity but also the terrible vulnerability.

Woodstock.com: What was the hardest part of doing the biography oh John Lennon?

Philip Norman: Doing the biography of John was the hardest part. There was a tremendous emotional weight. He is regarded as a secular saint and I felt everyone looking over my shoulder because I would have to go back and look at his life afresh. All of these songs that we know so well, that are second nature to so many people, all these events which have become sort of emblematic of a time in twentieth century history. I just felt half the world would be looking over my shoulder and seeing if I put a foot wrong, and that was a big strain.

 

Click here for more information and to browse inside the book.

Powered by Mango Blog. Design and Icons by N.Design Studio
RSS Feeds